Amongst the people in the an internet dating relationships, extremely were university students (77

89 (SD = 2.27); 4.94 (SD = 2.97), each other teams varying between 6 months and you may 11 years of dating; 7.76 (SD = cuatro.01), anywhere between a few and you may 19 many years; and you will (SD = chat zozo 4.82), anywhere between less than per year and you can 29 decades. 8%) and you may lived which have members of the family, if you find yourself men and women living with the partners have been generally functioning anyone (69.2%), at which 53% had school otherwise postgraduate levels. Of specialized union professionals, 67% had school or article-graduate amounts, of which 89.8% had been operating, 2% retired and you may 8.2% out of work. The functional situation to your hitched members is actually equivalent: 89.5% was in fact performing, dos.9% was basically resigned and 6.3% was unemployed, and step one.3% known various other a career position. Inside classification, 62.5% of your professionals got school or postgraduate stages.

Dating High quality, chose to confirm requirements validity, is actually counted on the Relationships Score Means–Modified (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt

The information and knowledge shown try collected inside the perspective from greater search plans, and therefore contains an in depth sociodemographic and you may relationship assessment, and also other balances in range away from intimate matchmaking.

Private commitment try analyzed according to the Portuguese adaptation (Desk step one) of your own less brand of new Persistence Level (Stanley, 1986), that has been translated with respect to the following the translation and you will retroversion measures: just after permission gotten by copywriter, the first level is interpreted by a couple of specialists in the field, these two translations had been confronted with retroversion from the a couple of positives, one to bilingual and another experienced in making use of this new English language; fundamentally, for every variation is compared to the unique measure, choosing employing brand new conditions and you can issues having deeper distance in order to it. The fresh new Portuguese version thus contained this new 14 brand spanking new affairs and the same address level and you will try titled, once deliberation by people, the personal Commitment Size (‘Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). To your latest stage of one’s translation processes, this new means are applied to 3 players towards purpose of confirming brand new adequateness of your own language while the unambiguous comprehension of those things, which have been chatted about to the participants after applying of the latest questionnaire. As there have been zero comments stating if you don’t, things remained an identical.

With respect to the full lifetime of the relationship, the common, in many years, to the additional statuses explained try, respectively: dos

by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.